The Following paper with Ken Binmore is published in JEBO volume 73(1), pp. 87-100,
January 2010,
accompanied by responses
by Fehr-Schmidt and Eckel-Gintis and a brief
rejoinder by Binmore-Shaked
Experimental
Economics: What Next? by K. Binmore & A. Shaked
(This version includes the unpublished Appendix)
Binmore Shaked’s JEBO rejoinder
My critique of Fehr-Schmidt’s papers
on Inequity Aversion started with the circulation of a Pamphlet on the
internet:
·
The Rhetoric of Inequity Aversion (1st
version
·
The Rhetoric of Inequity Aversion (2nd version
·
Ernst Fehr & Klaus Schmidt’s reply to the pamphlet
The Rhetoric of Inequity Aversion - A Reply (March 2005) by E. Fehr & K. Schmidt
·
I have written
a Brief Response to Fehr-Schmidt’s Reply:
A Brief Response to F&S
Reply to 'The Rhetoric of Inequity Aversion' (March 2005) by A. Shaked
·
I have also written a detailed analysis of FS’ papers
on Inequity Aversion
On the
Explanatory Value of Inequity Aversion Theory (Sept 2006) by A. Shaked
·
E-mail: shaked@uni-bonn.de
7831