The
Following paper with Ken Binmore is published in JEBO
volume 73(1), pp. 87-100, January 2010,
accompanied by responses by Fehr-Schmidt and Eckel-Gintis
and a brief rejoinder by Binmore-Shaked
Experimental
Economics: What Next? by K. Binmore & A. Shaked
Binmore Shaked’s JEBO rejoinder
My critique of Fehr-Schmidt’s papers on Inequity Aversion
started with the circulation of a Pamphlet on the internet:
· The Rhetoric of Inequity Aversion (1st
version
·
The Rhetoric of Inequity Aversion (2nd version
·
Ernst
Fehr & Klaus Schmidt’s reply to the pamphlet
The Rhetoric of Inequity Aversion - A Reply (March 2005) by E. Fehr &
K. Schmidt
· I have written a Brief Response to
Fehr-Schmidt’s Reply:
A Brief Response to F&S
Reply to 'The Rhetoric of Inequity Aversion' (March 2005) by A. Shaked
·
I have also written a detailed analysis of FS’ papers on
Inequity Aversion
On the Explanatory
Value of Inequity Aversion Theory (Sept 2006) by A. Shaked
·
E-mail: shaked@uni-bonn.de
7831