Template-Type: ReDIF-Paper 1.0
Title: Policy Concerns in an Era of Low Fertility: The Role of Social Comparisons and Intensive Parenting
Author-Name:  Lukas Mahler
Author-Email: lukas.mahler@kuleuven.be
Author-Name:  Michéle Tertilt
Author-Email: tertilt@uni-mannheim.de
Author-Name: Minchul Yum
Author-Email: yumm@vcu.edu
Classification-JEL: D62, E24, I21, I28, J13,
Keywords: Fertility, Comparison Motives, Externality, Parental Investments, Education, College Admissions, High-Stakes Testing, Family Policy, Pro-natal Policies, Education
Taxes, Quantity-Quality Trade-Off

Abstract: The global fertility rate has reached a record low, with nearly half of all countries now below replacement level. This has sparked renewed interest among
policymakers and researchers alike. In this paper, we explore a novel explanation for low birth rates based on comparison motives. We show theoretically that
strong comparison motives lead to high parental investments---both in time and money---and low fertility. We further show that comparison motives can
amplify fertility declines driven by other forces. We provide suggestive empirical support for the role of comparison motives in explaining cross-country and
within-U.S. regional variation in fertility. The resulting policy implications are different from those usually considered. Specifically, high-stakes testing in the
education system may heighten comparison motives and thereby contribute to fertility decline. Banning or taxing certain types of private education institutions
could reduce excessive parental investment and thereby stimulate fertility.
Note: 
Length: 70
Creation-Date: 2025-10
Revision-Date:
File-URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp705
File-Format: application/pdf
Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:CRCTR224_2025_705